Earlier today, President Trump tweeted a reference to a report by Chanel Rion of OANN highlighting that Dominion voting systems deleted 2.7 million votes for President Trump, and a further 435,000 votes were changed to Joe Biden, in a number of swing states:
“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”
The 2.7 million deleted votes and 435,000 refers only to votes deleted and switched by the Dominion electronic voting systems used in the election, and doesn't include destroyed paper ballots or extra batches of ballots found during the night.
The switched and deleted votes were detected from an analysis[1] of the official Edison election data feeds used by ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. The shocking figures can be broken down by state as follows:
▼
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Dominion systems manual: "Results files can be deleted by the user."
Earlier today (November 12), President Trump drew attention to the 2.7 million Trump votes deleted by Dominion voting systems, and the further 435,000 votes switched to Joe Biden.
After studying the Dominion systems manual, @PlaysTrumpCard has discovered that the system makes it shockingly easy to delete votes and switch votes. The Dominion website advertises their products as 'versatile solutions for any election scenario' and it's clear that the Dominion voting system is indeed extremely 'versatile' in that it is set up to make it easy to change, reject and delete results.
After studying the Dominion systems manual, @PlaysTrumpCard has discovered that the system makes it shockingly easy to delete votes and switch votes. The Dominion website advertises their products as 'versatile solutions for any election scenario' and it's clear that the Dominion voting system is indeed extremely 'versatile' in that it is set up to make it easy to change, reject and delete results.
Things start to get interesting in section 8 of the manual, with section 8.3 Result State Management discussing the various states of result files. The manual reveals, "Result files in this state (rejected) can be deleted by the user."
"Result files in this state can be deleted by the user." |
The manual then goes on to describe how validated votes can be moved to the rejected state:
Bill de Blasio's daughter: "Joe Biden was able to steal the election."
Joe Biden isn't the only one to make a revealing Freudian slip. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio's daughter, Chiara de Blasio, accidentally also made an unintentional admission during a recent street interview.
Chiara de Blasio: "Joe Biden was able to steal... steal, no ... able to win, sorry. He was able to win the election."
There was also another unintentional admission in her interview. In her opening sentence she referred to Kamala Harris as the 'first black Asian female President in office'. If Joe Biden had been allowed to steal this election, then Kamala Harris would have been the Vice President, not the President, but of course it's no secret that if the steal had been successful then Joe Biden would have very quickly been replaced.
"If democrats aren't allowed to rig an election, then democracy is truly dead."
"If we're not allowed to rig an election, suppress all speech about election results, and prevent anyone from using basic math and observations to verify the election outcome, then democracy is truly dead."
Credit: DeathBeforeCommunism
Ron CodeMonkeyZ explains how the Dominion software systems could be used for voter fraud.
Ron CodeMonkeyZ, the former 8kun admin, has been studying the 300+ page Dominion Voting Democracy Suite user manual, and has made a number of independent observations about how the systems could potentially be used for fraud.
Even if you're not technically minded, most of his findings are explained in a fairly straight forward manner for everyone to understand.
This was one of his first findings (emphasis mine):
"1) There is a setting to throw out votes for specific individual contests if you vote for a whole party.
"With the Party Preference contest, the voter selects their preferred party, and any contests which do not belong to the same Elector Group are ignored when the ballot is cast."
A bad operator could theoretically setup the ballot to put a specific candidate into a party that is not his official party. If you select his party and vote for the party, the individual candidate won't get a vote.
Scenario:
"With those stolen USB drives, someone could potentially change, purge, or inject ballots with impunity." |
This was one of his first findings (emphasis mine):
"1) There is a setting to throw out votes for specific individual contests if you vote for a whole party.
"With the Party Preference contest, the voter selects their preferred party, and any contests which do not belong to the same Elector Group are ignored when the ballot is cast."
A bad operator could theoretically setup the ballot to put a specific candidate into a party that is not his official party. If you select his party and vote for the party, the individual candidate won't get a vote.
Scenario:
Joe Biden is a lying dog faced pony soldier
"Will you pledge not to declare victory until the election is independently certified?"
Biden: "Yes."