ASOG report: " The Dominion Voting System is intentionally designed ... to create systemic fraud and influence election results."

Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, (ASOG) recently published  a preliminary summary of their Antrim Michigan Forensics Report. The report raises many issues, and makes the following conclusion:

"We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results."

"The vote flip occurred because of machine error
built into the software designed to create error."

The report elaborates:

"The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

ASOG is a group of professionals from various disciplines including Department of Defense, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency. ASOG has a particular emphasis on cybersecurity, open source investigation and penetration testing of networks, and employs a wide variety of cyber forensic analysts.

Other issues highlighted by the report include:

Summary of Trump Campaign lawsuit in Georgia

The Trump Campaign lawsuit in Georgia is now available online. It consists of 1,585 pages outlining significant evidence of fraud.

Here are some key points:

• 2,560 felons voted.
• 66,247 underage voters.
• 2,423 votes from people not registered.
• 1,043 individuals registered at PO boxes.
• 4,926 individuals who voted in Georgia after registering in another state.
• 395 individuals who voted in two states.
• 15,700 votes from people who moved out of state before the election.
• 40,279 votes of people who moved without re-registering in their new county.
• 30,000 - 40,000 absentee ballots lacking proper signature matching and verification.

The lawsuit also outlines violations of over 30 Georgia laws/codes and includes affidavits.

The lawsuit can be found at the following link: 

https://publicrecordsaccess.fultoncountyga.gov/app/RegisterOfActions/#/

Credit: @jennybethm

Video shows suitcases being wheeled out from under table once poll watchers were removed

Here's a short clip from OANN showing suitcases being wheeled out from under a table once the poll watchers had been removed from the counting center in Fulton County, Georgia:

"At about eight o'clock in the morning, we're going to roll this back and show it to you, there you go, so now they're going to start pulling these ballots out from under the table. This table, the black one, was placed there by the lady with the blond braids at about 8:22 in the morning, so she put that table there.

"So the same person who's staying behind now, the same person who cleared the place out under the pretense that we're going to stop counting, is the person who put the table there at 8:22 in the morning. Yeah, I saw four suitcases come out from underneath the table.

"Yeah, upper right hand, you see the gentleman in the red, so he just pulled one out.

"So 'what are these ballots doing there separate from all the other ballots, and why are they only counting them whenever the place is cleared out with no witnesses?' is the question.

Michigan 2020 Voting Analysis Report highlights statistical implausibilities in Monroe County

The National Pulse has highlighted a recently published 'Michigan 2020 Voting Analysis Report' produced by 'unpaid citizens and volunteer experts' which reveals numerous examples of statistical voting abnormalities in Michigan.

One of the most statistically implausible trends highlighted in the report, is the ratio of democrat absentee ballots to Republican absentee ballots in Monroe County. The report explains, 'the percentage of democratic absentee voters exceeds the percentage of Republican absentee voters in every precinct. Even more remarkable - and unbelievable - these two independent variables appear to track one another.'

As you can see from the graph below, the percentage of democrat absentee ballots in every precinct of Monroe County does indeed track the percentage of Republican absentee ballots.

It's almost as if someone has taken the Republican ballot percentages and simply added 30% to get the democrat ballot percentages. The chances of absentee ballots for democrats and Republicans in every precinct following such an identical ratio is ridiculously implausible, and looks very much like the work of an algorithm.

Fulton County elections officials deceived observers into leaving the counting center, then continued counting ballots in secret.

This tweet from David Shafer, Chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, is a couple of weeks old now, but it's worth revisiting:

"Let me repeat. Fulton County elections officials told the media and our observers that they were shutting down the tabulation center at State Farm Arena at 10:30 p.m. on election night only to continue counting ballots in secret until 1:00 a.m."

I can only think of one reason why you would tell poll watchers you were shutting down the voting center, only to then secretly continue counting the votes once the observers were no longer in the building.

Honest men have nothing to hide. Criminals don't like witnesses.

600K voting spike "prime indicator of fraudulent voting."

Here's a short clip from yesterday's Pennsylvania election hearing where Rudy Giuliani raises the issue of voting spikes:

Witness: "Normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up. Not any big spikes. That's kind of what Greg was talking about. The anomalies of loading and uploading those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting."

Rudy Giuliani: "And that's 604,000 votes in ninety minutes. Is that right?"

Witness: "Correct. This is, it's 337,000 votes in that..."

RG: "..in that period of time?"

Witness: "Yes."

RG: "And when you look at that entire curve with all these spikes can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for for Biden and how much for Trump?"

Witness: "Close to 600,000. I think our figures were about 570 some odd thousand that all those spikes represent over time."

RG: "For Biden?"

Witness: "Correct."

RG: "And how much for Trump?"

Detroit whistleblower: "They were overriding ballots."

Articia Bomer, a whistleblower who signed an affidavit testifying to fraud committed in Detroit, has revealed shocking details of poll workers overriding Trump votes to Biden votes. Here's a short clip of Articia describing what she witnessed:

"So how many of these straight red ticket or votes for President Trump did you witness approximately go back into the envelope or whatever after they were taken out?"

Articia Bomer: "So they came in a pack of 50. Out of the 50 there would be maybe just two that they were happy about. They put the rest all back in the envelope. They'd count fifty at a time. Two or three would be happy in each pile, would never be more than five ballots that they were happy about, that they actually passed around. They rolled out. One girl rolled them up and then she would roll them out with her hand, and to straighten them to make sure I guess they were going to get fed into the tabulator or something."

"So how many groups of 50 did you witness this happen with?"

AB: "More than 50. More than 100."

"Which table was this? Was it both tables?"

Rudy Giuliani: "100,000 ballots were brought in at 4:30 in the morning in Detroit in trucks that look like garbage trucks."

Here's a short clip of an interview where Rudy Giuliani talks about the early morning ballot drop in Michigan:

"Meanwhile the Attorney General of Michigan is missing the fact that 100,000 ballots were brought in at 4:30 in the morning in Detroit in trucks that look like garbage trucks, in garbage pails actually. All those ballots were counted for Biden with no Republican inspectors around. We've got something called witnesses that can testify to it under oath, but I guess the Michigan Attorney General doesn't like witnesses that testify under oath about things that are damaging to democrats.

"I mean what a phony. Total phony. What happened in Detroit can only be described as the worst fraud I've ever seen carried out deliberately by the hack democrat crooked party of Detroit. The overvotes are 140, 150, 200%, 300, 400%! How can you have 400% overvotes without having fraud? And the Attorney General doesn't care about that because he doesn't care about democrats stealing elections."

Wisconsin: The total number of indefinitely confined voters in 2020 was 169,282, more than the past 10 years combined.

Matt Braynard, Executive Director of Look Ahead America and Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President, has highlighted some interesting statistics in Wisconsin.

In Wisconsin, there is one type of absentee ballot that does not require ID: 'indefinitely confined.'^[1]

The total number of indefinitely confined voters between 2010 and 2019 was 40,709. In 2020, the number of indefinitely confined voters in Wisconsin dramatically shot up to 169,282, more than the past 10 years combined.

To illustrate just how extreme the jump in indefinitely confined voters was, here's the data presented as a graph:

The Wisconsin Elections Commission^[2] website states:

Media brainwashing techniques

Scott Adams has highlighted some of the terminology democrats and the establish media (but I repeat myself) are using as brainwashing techniques to falsely present the election as fair.

1) "Refuses to concede" is making you think past the sale that Trump's legal challenges will fail. This is their main persuasion trick.

2) "Audit" is being used to make a simple recount of (alleged) fraudulent ballots seem as if that could potentially find all types of fraud, which a recount is not designed to do. When none is found (because they are not looking), they will declare it proof there was no fraud.

3) "No evidence" is being used to reframe "plenty of evidence but not yet proven in court".

To play them at their own game, the establishment media would have us believe that the candidate that struggled to fill twenty hula hoops, beat the candidate who consistently got tens of thousands of supporters at his rallies. And yet despite hundreds of witnesses of election fraud, Joe Biden still hasn't conceded.

With regard to the falsely named 'audit', as President Trump has highlighted on numerous occasions, a recount is pointless if it simply recounts the same fraudulent ballots that were included in the original count.

47% of Americans say democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-trump ballots in several states

A Rasmussen poll has revealed that almost half of Americans believe democrats committed election fraud in an attempt to steal the election. This includes 36% who say it is 'Very likely' and 11% who say it is 'Somewhat likely.' Significantly, this belief that democrats stole votes is shared by thirty percent of democrats. The breakdown of the poll by party affiliation is as follows:

"How likely is it that democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure Biden would win?"

Republican = 75%, with 61% answering very likely.
Democrat = 30%, with 20% answering very likely.

Other = 39%, with 29% answering very likely.

The breakdown by age leans slightly towards older Americans:

18-39 = 47%, with 32% answering very likely.
40-64 = 47%, with 38% answering very likely.
65+ = 50%, with 40% answering very likely.

The breakdown by sex is as follows:

Male = 56%, with 40% answering very likely.
Female = 40%, with 33% answering very likely.

75% of Republicans say it is very likely the democrats
stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states.

Rasmussen also revealed that 90% of Trump voters said they were voting for President Trump (rather than against Joe Biden), whereas only 56% of Biden voters said they were voting for Joe Biden (rather than against President Trump) suggesting the primary focus of the media brainwashing is 'Orange man bad' rather than 'Pedo man good'.

The FBI investigating election fraud...

Credit: binford35

Or an alternative meme:

[Cover up crimes] [Cover up crimes]

If Dominion are innocent, then why are they acting as if they have something to hide?

Let's review some of the actions of Dominion Voting Systems and their employees in recent days...

• Dominion executives pulled out of Friday's oversight hearing and refused to testify before Pennsylvania state officials.
• Dominion have lawyered up.^[1]
• Dominion have removed Eric Coomer, a Dominion director with Trump Derangement Syndrome, from their online list of directors.
• Dominion have blocked public replies to their tweets.
• Since election day, over 100 of 243 Dominion employees have deleted their LinkedIn profiles.

On top of all this, Dominion's office in Toronto shares a floor with Tides Foundation, a very prominent left-wing group tied to George Soros. China's Jantzi Sustainalytics is in the same building too.

Emerald Robinson sums it up perfectly...

Pennsylvania: 7,403 ballots received by the government BEFORE they were even mailed out!

Here's a short and to the point video from @gregontheright that highlights voting irregularities in Pennsylvania using data freely available in the public domain.

"The following information is straight from the pa.gov website and has almost 3.1 million entries. I exported all that information into an excel sheet, but I was cut off at about 1 million rows so keep in mind we're working with one third of the whole data set.

"So the first thing I do is create a column to see if any ballots were mailed out by the government the same day that there were received filled out through the mail by the voter. Turns out about 11,000 were filled out by the voter and returned back to the government the same day the government mailed them out to the voter.

Election fraud deniers

 

Don't be an election fraud denier.

Ostriches don't actually bury their heads in the sand.

Neither should fraud deniers.

Election fraud is real. #MathSaysSo

- - - - - - - - - -

'Election fraud deniers' is a phrase we need to bring into common usage. It sums up the establishment sheep perfectly. As the meme above says, math shows election fraud is real. Here are just a couple of examples:
Evidence of algorithm: "We observed raw vote data that includes decimal places."
The statistics behind Joe Biden's 'miraculous' late surge of Wisconsin votes

Evidence of algorithm: "We observed raw vote data that includes decimal places."

A sworn affidavit from cybersecurity expert, Russell James Ramsland, Jr, highlights some very interesting observations regarding statistical impossibilities in the vote count. Russell James Ramsland, Jr., part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, raises numerous red flags in the affidavit, four of which include:

1) Over 100% turnout
2) Decimal points in voter totals
3) Massive voting spikes
4) More ballots counted than physically possible.

Let's look at each red flag in greater detail:

1) Over 100% turnout

Paragraph 11 of the affidavit highlights the statistically impossible voter turnout in numerous precincts:

"There were at least 19 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters Based on Reported Statistics exceeded 100%."

Xerox

Xerox. The choice of democrat strongholds and other counterfeiters since 1960.

Credit: EndHumanTrafficking2

- - - - - - - - - -

For the benefit of any low intelligence Snopes readers, this is a meme. It is not an actual ad.

"We know you're hearing issues about Sharpie Markers. We need to use markers on election day." #SharpieGate

An email sent by Kelly Dixon, the Maricopa County Elections Recruitment and Training Assistant Director, has raised further questions regarding #Sharpiegate.

"We NEED to use Markers on Election Day."

Kelly's email acknowledges that there have been issues with Sharpie markers:

"We've heard you and we know you're hearing issues and concerns about the Sharpie Markers."

Given the issues with Sharpie markers, the email then goes on to advice handing out ballpoint pens to voters. However, rather suspiciously, Kelly instructs that ballpoint pens should only be used for specific dates:

"Starting tomorrow, 10/23, and through 11/2, we are asking that Clerks hand voters BALLPOINT PENS rather than markers. We NEED to use Markers on Election Day, but for now and through 11/2, hand voters a Ballpoint Pen."

Given that there are issues with Sharpie markers, why would Kelly encourage clerks to switch to Sharpie markers on election day? On 11/3 do markers magically start working? Do the issues magically disappear on election day?

Dominion machines linked to electronic election fraud back in 2011

Here's a report on an example of electronic election fraud dating back to 2011. The end of the report reveals, "Dominion is the company behind the machines."
 

Cynthia Zirkle: "They called it backwards. It was simply backwards."

Reporter: "South Jersey voting machine incident makes waves."

Narrator: "It was 2011 and Cynthia Zirkle and her husband Ernie were running in a local election in their home town of Fairton, New Jersey."

Reporter: "Was this a big deal here?"

Google censoring autocomplete suggestions for 'election fraud'

It seems that Google have taken action to ensure 'election fraud' fails to appear in their list of autocomplete suggestions. If you type 'election f' into Google, this is the list of autocomplete suggestions it comes up with...

No mention of election fraud.

The top four autocomplete suggestions are 'election forecast', election france', 'Election 1999 film' and 'election final results'. There's no mention of election fraud.

Google autocomplete suggestions are self-learning and come from real searches, so the more times someone searches for a particular term the higher it should rank in Google's list of autocomplete suggestions. Perhaps then, people simply aren't searching for election fraud?

Well, in the interest of fairness let's compare those four top suggested search terms with 'election fraud' to compare the popularity of each search term. Here's a comparison according to Google Trends with the red line representing searches for 'election fraud'...