"According to Congressional intent and past precedent, there is no President-Elect."

The media and the democrats have falsely been using the term 'President Elect' in order to manipulate people into mistakenly believing that Joe Biden won the election. Congressman Jody Hice, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, recently issued a letter to correct the democrats' fraudulent use of terminology, and to remind the General Services Administration (GSA) to adhere to the Constitution. 

Arguably the key sentence from the letter is this:

"According to Congressional intent and past precedent set by President Clinton, as of today, there is no apparent President-Elect."

Page 1

The full text of the letter is reproduced below:

"Dear Administrator Murphy:

On November 9, 2020, Democratic House Members sent you a letter that misrepresented the facts surrounding your responsibilities under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (Act).^[1] I write to correct the record.^[2] However, this assistance can only occur after there are “apparent successful candidates for the office of the President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator [you].”^[3]

There are enough state contests in question, such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice-President-Elect. Precedent and legislative history present three situations where there may be an un-apparent President-Elect: