A warning from President Trump

After making calls to American troops on Thanksgiving Day, President Trump took questions from reporters. Here was his response when he was asked if he'd attend 'Joe Biden's inauguration':

Speaker 11: "You know that it's tradition for previous presidents to go to the next president's inauguration. So will you attend Joe Biden's?"

President Trump: "I don't want to say that yet."

Speaker 11: "But he is going to be inaugurated."

President Trump: "I mean, I know the answer. I'll be honest. I know the answer, but I just don't want to say it yet."

Speaker 11: "Is that a yes?"

President Trump: "Look. A thing like this possibly has never happened before, but maybe people just didn't catch it. But we've caught it."

If President Trump believed Joe Biden was going to be inaugurated, then he could have given a very straight forward response. The fact that he didn't should act as a warning for all those in the establishment media who believe that Joe Biden is going to be allowed to steal this election.

- - - - - - - - - -

You can read the full transcript at the link below:
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-thanksgiving-call-to-troops-transcript-2020-addresses-possibility-of-conceding-election

"Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution."

Below is Chairman of the Republican Party of Texas, Allen West's statement in regards to the decision by the Supreme Court to dismiss Texas's constitutionally legitimate and critical lawsuit.

"The Supreme Court, in tossing the Texas lawsuit that was joined by seventeen states and 106 US congressman, have decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law. Resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences. This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable. This decision will have far reaching ramifications for the future of our constitutional republic. Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution."

Trump campaign statements on Texas Supreme Court case

The Trump campaign has issued the following statements on the Texas Supreme Court case:

- December 9, 2020 -

President Trump Moves to Intervene in Texas Supreme Court Case

Donald J. Trump, in his personal capacity as candidate for re-election as President of the United States, today moved to intervene in the Texas v. Pennsylvania. et. al. action at the United States Supreme Court. The President intervened because his rights as a candidate are affected by the Defendant States' failure to follow and enforce state election laws during the 2020 election.

The Trump campaign issued the following statements:

New YouTube logo

With YouTube openly going full authoritarian and censoring all videos and comments which mention election fraud, they have decided to update their logo accordingly...

Credit: JesusLovesTrump

Summary of Trump Campaign lawsuit in Georgia

The Trump Campaign lawsuit in Georgia is now available online. It consists of 1,585 pages outlining significant evidence of fraud.

Here are some key points:

• 2,560 felons voted.
• 66,247 underage voters.
• 2,423 votes from people not registered.
• 1,043 individuals registered at PO boxes.
• 4,926 individuals who voted in Georgia after registering in another state.
• 395 individuals who voted in two states.
• 15,700 votes from people who moved out of state before the election.
• 40,279 votes of people who moved without re-registering in their new county.
• 30,000 - 40,000 absentee ballots lacking proper signature matching and verification.

The lawsuit also outlines violations of over 30 Georgia laws/codes and includes affidavits.

The lawsuit can be found at the following link: 

https://publicrecordsaccess.fultoncountyga.gov/app/RegisterOfActions/#/

Credit: @jennybethm

Sidney Powell: "Three states before the Supreme Court with enough electoral votes to change the outcome before the end of the week."

In an interview on Greg Kelly Reports, Sidney Powell has said that there should be at least three states before the Supreme Court before the end of the week. You can watch the clip below:

Greg Kelly: "Will you be in the Supreme Court tomorrow? You said emergency relief. Does that entail you going there? How's that going to actually work?"

Sidney Powell: "That's going to work as fast as we can humanly make it work. It may not be tomorrow, but we also have a case out of Michigan that needs to go, a case out of Arizona that may very well wind up there. There should be at least three states before the Supreme Court with enough electoral votes to change the outcome before the end of the week."

GK: "Sidney Powell, I wish I was an attorney and I could help out, or I knew something about computers, but I don't. The good thing is I know you're not on your own. I know you have a lot of good attorneys and good people working with you. We wish you all the...

SP: "We have an amazing team of great patriots."

"If the situation was reversed..."

One of the problems when trying to argue with NPCs and leftist establishment sheep is that they have been 'debrained'. That is to say, they are incapable of using their brains to think for themselves. All they do is blindly parrot whatever narrative is fed to them by the establishment media.

"Debunked!" is one of their favorite phrases which allows them to cling to their programming without having to engage their brains. I've read some arguments from NPCs which could even be paraphrased as, "Fraud is not evidence of fraud!"

So here's one way to respond to debrained establishment sheep with a question that confronts them with a hard truth...

"If the situation was reversed and President Trump won reelection because Republican poll workers tossed the democrat poll challengers out, then suitcases of extra Trump ballots were rolled in, and the same Trump ballots were fed through counting machines three times, then would you accept President Trump's victory in this scenario and expect Joe Biden to concede?
YES [  ] NO [  ]

Copy and paste this question and yes/no options to your reply. Place an X in the box that represents your one reply, and spare me any additional comment that you'd want to give."

Any objective person knows the only logical answer is no, but if they answer no they destroy their own argument. If they answer yes then it is obvious they don't care about election integrity and they will flip to whatever position and tell whatever lies they think will help their cause.