Arguably the key sentence from the letter is this:
"According to Congressional intent and past precedent set by President Clinton, as of today, there is no apparent President-Elect."
Page 1 |
"Dear Administrator Murphy:
On November 9, 2020, Democratic House Members sent you a letter that misrepresented the facts surrounding your responsibilities under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (Act).[1] I write to correct the record.[2] However, this assistance can only occur after there are “apparent successful candidates for the office of the President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator [you].”[3]
There are enough state contests in question, such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice-President-Elect. Precedent and legislative history present three situations where there may be an un-apparent President-Elect:
1. The drafters of the Act anticipated three electoral situations where there would be an unapparent President-Elect: (1) a tie, (2) a plurality winner, or (3) the presence of extensive voter fraud or intimidation.[4] The third being applicable to 2020 since the Trump campaign has raised questions and filed legal challenges in several states;
Page 2 |
3. The precedent set by the Clinton Administration in the contested 2000 election is that to ascertain an apparent President-Elect there would need to be a concession—which has not yet occurred in 2020—or no more legitimate continuing legal challenges—which has not yet occurred in 2020.[6]
According to Congressional intent and past precedent set by President Clinton, as of today, there is no apparent President-Elect.
A GSA spokesman recently stated that “the GSA Administrator ascertains the apparent successful candidate once a winner is clear based on the process laid out in the Constitution.”[7] I strongly encourage you to do just that: follow the Constitution and past precedent, not the media, when making your determination of the President-Elect. This democracy relies on a rule of law and the law must be followed.
Sincerely,
Jody Hice
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Government Operations
[1] Letter from Gerry Connolly, et. al., Member of Congress, to Emily Murphy, Administrator, U.S. Gen. Serv. Admin. (Nov. 9, 2020) available at https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4126; See Presidential Transition Act of 1963, Pub. L. No. 88-277, § 3(c), 78 Stat. 153 (1964).
[2] Id.
[3] Id (emphasis added).
[4] Transitioning to a New Administration: Can the Next President be Ready: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Gov’t Mgmt, Information, and Technology, Comm. on Gov’t Reform, 106th Cong, 2nd Session, (Dec. 4, 2000) (Prepared Statement of Paul C. Light).
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Courtney Buble, GSA Holds the Key to When or If Biden Gets Access to Full Transition Resources, GOV’T EXEC. (Nov. 6, 2020), https://www.govexec.com/management/2020/11/gsa-faces-tricky-decision-ascertaining-electionwinner-formally-kicking-transition/169854/."
- - - - - - - - - -
The original pdf of the letter can be found at the following link:
https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Letter-to-GSA-re-Transition-final-11.13.20-1.pdf
- - - - - - - - - -
The original pdf of the letter can be found at the following link:
https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Letter-to-GSA-re-Transition-final-11.13.20-1.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment